Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052345›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Total cancer risk estimates from measured concentrations of volatile organic compounds in industrialized southeastern Louisiana.

Ellis S Robinson, Amira Yassine, Shivang Agarwal, Mina W Tehrani, Sara N Lupolt, Andrea A Chiger, Carolyn Gigot, Megan S Claflin, Brian M Lerner, Tara I Yacovitch and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The upside and challenge of getting it wrong.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ellis S RobinsonDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-6392
Amira YassineDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-6183
Shivang AgarwalDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Mina W TehraniDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Sara N LupoltDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0001-6263-5333
Andrea A ChigerDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Carolyn GigotDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-5539
Megan S ClaflinCenter for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-8712
Brian M LernerCenter for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-8165
Tara I YacovitchCenter for Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-116X
Joseph R RoscioliCenter for Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.
Scott C HerndonCenter for Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0000-0002-7348-8225
Anita M AveryCenter for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-9664
Conner DaubeCenter for Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.
Elizabeth M LunnyCenter for Atmospheric and Environmental Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.
Edward C FortnerCenter for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.ORCID 0009-0006-2884-7344
Benjamin S WerdenCenter for Aerosol and Cloud Chemistry, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821.
Thomas A BurkeDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-9580-476X
Ana M RuleDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-0749
Kirsten KoehlerDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-6945
Keeve E NachmanDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-4151
Peter F DeCarloDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0001-6385-7149

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES032756 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas Hartung · 2022 to 2026
$6.0M
Translation CoreP2CES033415 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kirsten Anne Koehler · 2022 to 2026
$4.8M
Bloomberg Philanthropies (BP) 2021-100480EPA 68HERC21C0047HHS | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (DEHS) P2CES033415HHS | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (DEHS) P30ES032756NIEHS NIH HHS P2C ES033415NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES032756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communities in southeastern Louisiana are subject to disproportionate environmental health burdens, including elevated risk for cancer, from emissions of industrial hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). However, there are few ambient measurements (or none) of various HAPs in the heavily industrialized corridor between Baton Rouge and New Orleans (BR-NO). We measured 17 carcinogenic volatile organic compounds using fast-response in situ instrumentation aboard a mobile laboratory. Using spatially resolved concentrations, we estimate cancer risk in 15 census tracts along an 81 km-long stretch of the BR-NO corridor. In 14 of 15 tracts, our estimates of total cancer risk were higher (range: 0.9 to 11.6[Formula: see text]; median: 5[Formula: see text]) than those from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) 2020 Air Toxics Screening Assessment (AirToxScreen). Our maximum estimate for total tract-level cancer risk was 560-in-one million excess cancer cases, far exceeding the upper limit of USEPA's acceptable risk range (100-in-one million). This discrepancy is largely explained by differences between measured vs. modeled ethylene oxide concentrations, though there are important contributions from a number of additional HAPs. Our risk estimates are dominated by ethylene oxide, which contributes between 39.5 and 92.2% of total cancer risk across all tracts; chloroprene (0.2 to 36.8%); and formaldehyde (4.1 to 14.6%). AirToxScreen also identifies these three compounds as primary drivers of risk in this location. Together, these three compounds account for between 63 and 96.9% of total cancer risk. There is substantial spatial variability in total cancer risk and the relative contribution of each HAP, both between and within tracts. These data substantiate claims that the region has high HAPs-related cancer risk and quantify which individual HAPs are of highest concern.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsNeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansLouisianaRisk AssessmentAir PollutantsVolatile Organic Compoundscancer riskenvironmental justicehazardous air pollutantsmobile monitoringvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID41052345
PMCPMC12541328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.