Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052328›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Multispecies sensory networks and social foraging strategies: Implications for population decline in procellariiform seabirds.

Jesse Granger, Gabrielle Nevitt, Sönke Johnsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Agonistic interactions and vocalizations among Procellariiformes in multi-species feeding aggregations, observed through bird-borne cameras.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Marine radar reveals novel group foraging patterns in pelagic seabirds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Social interactions during foraging may be a key to survival for seabirds in the Southern Ocean.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Multispecies sensory networks and social foraging strategies: Implications for population decline in procellariiform seabirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jesse GrangerDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0001-7309-7905
Gabrielle NevittDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-2126
Sönke JohnsenDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

Funding

DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-20-1-0399DOD | National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) NDSEG3284CNBS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multispecies sensory networks, where different species prioritize different sensory modalities and then use heterospecific information in a likely noncooperative fashion, may allow animals to improve foraging over large areas for cryptic prey. We test this hypothesis in procellariiform seabirds that forage in mixed flocks, where both prey odors and visual cues provided by other foraging hetero- and conspecifics might improve success rates. Using agent-based models, we explored the impact of social strategies on olfactory foraging for Antarctic krill (

Indexed as

BirdsFeeding BehaviorPredatory BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsEuphausiaceaModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsSmellcollective behaviorconservationflockingmodelingolfaction

Identifiers

PMID41052328
PMCPMC12541421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.