Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052297›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Manipulating early-life environment and handling alters growth trajectories, immune and stress responses, clinical indicators, and intestinal health in young pigs.

Kaitlyn M Sommer, Zimu Li, Ryan N Dilger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaitlyn M SommerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Zimu LiNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Ryan N DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-2845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stressors are factors that disrupt homeostasis; in pigs this includes challenges in sow management, human interaction, and weaning. These typically occur in the first month of life, compromising welfare and decreasing growth and increasing mortality. This study investigated the impact of early-life stressors on pig growth, immune response, and coping ability. The study utilized a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with factors including rearing environment [2 levels; sow-reared (SR) or artificially-reared (AR)] and handling (2 levels; handled for 2 min daily or weekly). Therefore, 72 pigs (38 gilts and 34 boars) were allotted to 1 of 4 treatments on postnatal day (PND) 2 based on their litter of origin and body weight (BW): 1) SR-W (sow-reared, weekly-handled); 2) SR-D (sow-reared, daily-handled); 3) AR-W (artificially-reared, weekly-handed); and 4) AR-D (artificially-reared, daily-handled). AR pigs were housed individually with ad libitum access to reconstituted milk replacer, while SR pigs were group housed and received all nutrients from the sow. On PND 21, rearing environment and handling interventions ended, and pigs were transferred to group nursery pens according to their original treatment assignment. One week later, on PND 28, all pigs received a 5ug/kg of BW injection of lipopolysaccharide to stimulate an innate immune response. On PND 35, all pigs were euthanized to permit sample collection. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA via the MIXED procedure of SAS. During PND 2-21, AR pigs had greater (P < 0.05) BW gain than SR pigs. Consequently, AR pigs had the heaviest (P < 0.05) BW on PND 21 and 35 compared with SR pigs. However, SR pigs exhibited higher (P < 0.05) feed efficiency during PND 21-35 compared with AR pigs. As a classic marker of stress, fecal secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations were highest (P < 0.05) in SR pigs compared with AR pigs on PND 21. On PND 35, daily-handled pigs exhibited longer (P < 0.05) small intestinal tract length than weekly-handled pigs. Furthermore, SR pigs had increased (P < 0.05) absolute and relative ileal weights, but lower (P < 0.05) absolute duodenal mass compared with AR pigs. Lastly, daily-handled pigs displayed increased (P < 0.05) TNF-α, IL-1β, and occludin mRNA expression relative to weekly-handled pigs, while AR pigs had increased (P < 0.05) mRNA expression of IFN-γ and IL-1β compared with SR pigs. In conclusion, early-life rearing environment and handling frequency influenced growth, immune and stress response, clinical indicators, and intestinal health.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryIntestinesStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleSwinehandlingimmune responsepigsrearing environmentstress

Identifiers

PMID41052297
PMCPMC12578501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.