Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052279›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.

Jiangyan Zhang, Haolin Li, Yuncong Zhang, Junyang Huang, Liping Ren, Chuantao Zhang, Quan Zou, Yang Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiangyan ZhangSchool of Pharmacy/School of Modern Chinese Medicine Industry, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, 611137, China.
Haolin LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, 611137, China.
Yuncong ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhuhai People's Hospital (The Affiliated Hospital of Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), No. 79, Kangning Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, 519000, China.
Junyang HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 32, Section 2, West Yihuan Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610072, China.
Liping RenSchool of Healthcare Technology, Chengdu Neusoft University, No. 1, Neusoft Avenue, Qingchengshan Town, Dujiangyan City, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 611844, China.
Chuantao ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39, Shi'erqiao Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610072, China.
Quan ZouInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Avenue, High-tech Zone (West Zone), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 611731, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-1142
Yang ZhangInnovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Academy for Interdiscipline, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, 611137, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-120X

Funding

Chengdu Health Commission-Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Joint Research Fund WXLH202402041National Natural Science Foundation of China 62202069National Natural Science Foundation of China 62471071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity risk assessment plays a crucial role in determining the clinical success and market potential of drug candidates. Traditional animal-based testing is costly, time-consuming, and ethically controversial, which has led to the rapid development of computational toxicology. This review surveys over 20 ADMET prediction platforms, categorizing them into rule/statistical-based methods, machine learning (ML) methods, and graph-based methods. We also summarize major toxicological databases into four types: chemical toxicity, environmental toxicology, alternative toxicology, and biological toxin databases, highlighting their roles in model training and validation. Furthermore, we review recent advancements in ML and artificial intelligence (AI) applied to toxicity prediction, covering acute toxicity, organ-specific toxicities, and carcinogenicity. The field is transitioning from single-endpoint predictions to multi-endpoint joint modeling, incorporating multimodal features. We also explore the application of generative modeling techniques and interpretability frameworks to improve the accuracy and credibility of predictions. Additionally, we discuss the use of network toxicology in evaluating the safety of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and the potential of large language models (LLMs) in literature mining, knowledge integration, and molecular toxicity prediction. Finally, we address current challenges, including data quality, model interpretability, and causal inference, and propose future directions such as multi-omics integration, interpretable AI models, and domain-specific LLMs, aiming to provide more efficient and precise technical support for preclinical toxicity assessments in drug development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryToxicologyAnimalsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentADMET predictioncomputational toxicologydrug discoverylarge language modelsmachine learningtoxin databases

Identifiers

PMID41052279
PMCPMC12499773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.