ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- MacroTox: A Macroscopic Graph Topology-Based Multimodal Learning Framework for Robust Molecular Toxicity Prediction.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- ADMET-XSpec: A Tool for Systematic Cross-Species Data Integration in ADMET Prediction.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Context-Aware Multilevel Classification of Semantic Relations in Drug-Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Networks-Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) as a Case Study.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Article
- AI in Drug Discovery: Clinical Failures, Regulatory Reality, and the Validation Crisis Behind the Hype.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning for Accelerated Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Unmet Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Human Intestinal Organoids into FDA's New Approach Methodologies for Drug Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- A Multitask Active Learning Framework with Probabilistic Modeling for Multi-Species Acute Toxicity Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting toxicity and bioactivity of the chemical exposome: a case study for the blood exposome database.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence drives the identification and screening of novel antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The Tumor Cell Proliferation Inhibitory Activity of the Human Herpes Virus Type 6 U94 Protein Relies on a Stable Tridimensional Conformation.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, andRSC advances · 2026Article
- Porphyrin pathways as targets for combating antimicrobial resistance: virulence and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Review on the Toxicity of Five Main AQ Constituents from Rhubarb: Mechanisms, Challenges and Future Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning for precision prevention of cognitive decline: integrating multimodal biomarkers, lifestyle interventions, and natural medicines from prediction to clinical practice.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Toxicity risk assessment plays a crucial role in determining the clinical success and market potential of drug candidates. Traditional animal-based testing is costly, time-consuming, and ethically controversial, which has led to the rapid development of computational toxicology. This review surveys over 20 ADMET prediction platforms, categorizing them into rule/statistical-based methods, machine learning (ML) methods, and graph-based methods. We also summarize major toxicological databases into four types: chemical toxicity, environmental toxicology, alternative toxicology, and biological toxin databases, highlighting their roles in model training and validation. Furthermore, we review recent advancements in ML and artificial intelligence (AI) applied to toxicity prediction, covering acute toxicity, organ-specific toxicities, and carcinogenicity. The field is transitioning from single-endpoint predictions to multi-endpoint joint modeling, incorporating multimodal features. We also explore the application of generative modeling techniques and interpretability frameworks to improve the accuracy and credibility of predictions. Additionally, we discuss the use of network toxicology in evaluating the safety of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and the potential of large language models (LLMs) in literature mining, knowledge integration, and molecular toxicity prediction. Finally, we address current challenges, including data quality, model interpretability, and causal inference, and propose future directions such as multi-omics integration, interpretable AI models, and domain-specific LLMs, aiming to provide more efficient and precise technical support for preclinical toxicity assessments in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.