Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41052214›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

A mixture of attention experts-embedded flow-based generative model to create synthetic cells in single-cell RNA-Seq datasets.

Sultan Sevgi Turgut Ögme, Nizamettin Aydin, Zeyneb Kurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sultan Sevgi Turgut ÖgmeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nizamettin AydinDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-2247
Zeyneb KurtInformation School, The University of Sheffield, The Wave, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-8091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNAseq) analyses performed at the cellular level aim to understand the cellular landscape of tissue sections, offer insights into rare cell-types, and identify marker genes for annotating distinct cell types. ScRNAseq analyses are widely applied to cancer research to understand tumor heterogeneity, disease progression, and resistance to therapy. Single-cell data processing is a challenging task due to its high-dimensionality, sparsity, and having imbalanced class(cell-type) distributions. An accurate cell-type identification is highly dependent on preprocessing and quality control steps. To address these issues, generative models have been widely used in recent years. Techniques frequently used include Variational Autoencoders (VAE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Gaussian-based methods, and, more recently, Flow-based (FB) generative models. We developed a Masked Affine Autoregressive transform-embedded FB (MAF-FB) model. Then, to improve MAF-FB further, we incorporated a mixture of experts (MOE) of attention mechanisms on top of it, resulting in our proposed MOE-FB model. We conducted a comparative analysis of fundamental generative models, aiming to serve as a preliminary guidance for developing novel automated scRNAseq data analysis systems. We performed a large-scale analysis by combiningfour datasets derived from pancreatic tissue sections and for further generalizability assessments, we employed Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC68K and PBMC3K) and Human Cell Atlas Bone Marrow (HCA-BM10K) datasets. We utilized VAE, GAN, Gaussian Copula, and Automated Cell-Type-informed Introspective Variational Autoencoder (ACTIVA), and compared them against our two novel FB models, MAF-FB and MOE-FB for ScRnaseq synthesis. To evaluate the performances of generative models, we used various discrepancy metrics and performed automated cell-type classification tasks. We also identified differentially expressed genes for each cell type, and inferred cell-cell interactions based on ligand-receptor bindings across distinct cell-type pairs. Among the generative models, FB models, especially MOE-FB, consistently outperformed others across all experimental setups in both discrepancy metrics with comparison to the baseline test set and cell-type classification tasks (with an F1-score of 0.90 precision of 0.89 and recall of 0.92 for the integrated pancreatic datasets). MOE-FB produced biologically more relevant synthetic data, and ligand-receptor-based cell-cell interactions inferred from the synthetic cells closely resemble the original data, achieving an RMSE of 0.65 against the corresponding pancreatic test set. These findings highlight the potential and promising use of FB models, especially MOE-FB, in scRNAseq analyses.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41052214
PMCPMC12500167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.