ArticlePloS one2025
Building health: Motivational factors to enhance systematic work environment management in the construction industry.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate whether and how the interventions have been beneficial in developing a well-functioning systematic OSH management. The aim was also to investigate whether and how the interventions have facilitated or impeded autonomous motivation to develop a well-functioning systematic OSH management.
methodData were collected through individual interviews with participants in the Health Construction intervention project and audio recordings from the concluding workshop for each batch. The data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.
resultsThe seven themes from the analysis yielded the following results. Participation in the project was highlighted as a key factor for development, as it offered opportunities to collaborate and share experiences and insights about the domain of the occupational environment with representatives from other companies. Establishing a development team within participating companies appears to have influenced the legitimacy of occupational safety and health, as well as the assigned safety priority. A process consultative approach by external consultants seems to have contributed to an enhanced ability to articulate thoughts, identify solutions, synthesize discussions, and work effectively within the development team. The results suggest that the assigned safety priority of the respective participating companies has increased. Additionally, there are indications that autonomous motivation to continue and deepen efforts to address safety and health issues in a structured way has increased within the participating companies.
conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the interventions implemented in the project have been beneficial in fostering the development of a well-functioning systematic occupational safety and health management. This may have been achieved by enhancing the autonomous motivation to prioritize and develop a healthy and safe work environment within the participating companies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.