ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing and comparing early warning signal performance in spatially-structured systems.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting instabilities in transient landforms and interconnected ecosystems.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical transitions occur when a system undergoes a sudden shift from one state to another. Early warning signals (EWS) are indicators that can be used to potentially anticipate critical transitions in such systems, which may be temporal or spatio-temporal. Temporal systems are those whose state varies over time, whereas spatio-temporal systems also vary over a spatial domain. While temporal EWS can be applied to spatio-temporal systems by averaging over the spatial domain, spatially-informed EWS should, in principle, be able to outperform their temporal counterparts by making use of the additional spatial information. We seek to understand how EWS for spatial systems compare to those used for temporal systems. To facilitate comparison, we explore how EWS performance is measured. We use the strength of EWS trends, quantified using Kendall's τ, as a proxy for performance. Other factors, such as robustness to choices of parameters used for detrending, statistical significance, and agreement with expected EWS behaviour, are considered. This assessment of EWS based on these factors enables an informed comparison and decision regarding which signals to apply to different systems for potential indications of critical transitions. We find that while spatially-informed EWS generally offer improved performance over temporal EWS for the example systems studied, we find the choice is system specific.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.