ArticlePloS one2025
"I know what to say now" Students' evaluation and utilisation of Accidental Counsellor Training.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn 2020 and 2021, 280 health profession students who were engaged in student leadership roles and peer mentoring were invited to undertake extracurricular training in accidental counselling to build skills in recognising and responding to a person in distress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of the online training course, and to explore students' confidence to use Accidental Counsellor tools to support peers in distress after completion of the training course.
methodsA retrospective cohort study including a post- intervention only design was used. A survey was administered approximately 12 months after 225 students completed an Accidental Counsellor training program. The survey instrument assessed reluctance or confidence to recognise and respond to someone having a mental health crisis, and acceptability of the training. Reliability coefficients were computed for scales, and descriptive analyses including frequencies and percentages were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27). Open-text responses underwent descriptive content analysis.
resultsSixty-one students completed the online survey. Of these, 90% felt confident and 85% felt low reluctance to respond to peer mental health crises. Nearly all (85%) participants recognised at least one person in distress in the 12 months following the training. T-test confirmed no gender differences in mean confidence score (Men mean = 30.0, Std. dev. = 2.90; Women mean = 29.5, std. dev. = 4.80; t(63)=0.48, p = 0.633), however, there was a statistically significant difference between age groups as determined by one-way ANOVA (F(2,62)=7.43, p = 0.001). Listening non-judgmentally and referring the person to resources was the most common response to peer distress. The online format was described as offering accessibility and interaction benefits but lacked realism and engagement for some.
conclusionWith ever increasing rates of depression and other mental health conditions being reported among university students, there is increasing pressure to develop strategies to support mental health and wellbeing. This project is unique in evaluating an online delivery of Accidental Counsellor training. Since completing the training, most participants recognized at least one person in distress and reported confidence and skill to respond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.