ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Dosimetric effect of internal error correction on pubic bones in image-guided passive scattering proton therapy for prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image-guided passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) has been widely adopted in Japan and worldwide, with substantial long-term clinical data supporting its efficacy in treating prostate cancer. However, as hypofractionated protocols become increasingly common, the impact of internal anatomical shifts on surrounding organs at risk (OARs) warrants renewed attention. The pubic bones, situated near the prostate, are often exposed to unintended high doses, especially during internal error correction based on fiducial marker alignment. This study retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with PSPT using lateral opposed fields. Simulated isocenter shifts were applied anteriorly and inferiorly in 2-mm increments up to 10 mm to assess dose changes to the pubic bones. Dose-volume histogram metrics including V80%, V90% and V95% were evaluated. Pubic bones dose increased in both shift directions, with a more pronounced effect for anterior shifts, with a 10-mm anterior shift increasing V80% by 14.2 cc on average-2.4 times greater than inferior shifts. Dose elevation correlated strongly with the anatomical proximity between the clinical target volume and pubic bones (r > 0.66, P < 0.001). These results suggest that anterior correction in PSPT can cause substantial dose escalation to the pubic bones, potentially increasing the risk of insufficiency fractures. As extreme hypofractionation becomes more common, careful evaluation of pubic bones dose should be incorporated into treatment planning, alongside traditional OARs such as the rectum and bladder. Early replanning should be considered when persistent anterior displacement is observed to maintain patient safety and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.