ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Evaluating the effects of air cushions on body pressure distribution and thermal insulation in evacuation shelters: A randomized controlled crossover study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In large-scale disasters such as the anticipated Nankai Trough Earthquake, millions of evacuees are expected to remain in shelters, often sleeping on cold, hard floors in classrooms and gymnasiums, contributing to musculoskeletal pain and sleep disruption. While cardboard beds have been employed since the Great East Japan Earthquake due to their rapid mass-production capability, municipalities are not required to stockpile them, and many were unable to provide sufficient quantities during the Kumamoto Earthquake. Furthermore, the large size and weight of these beds complicate timely delivery, and their use alone provides only limited body pressure distribution. Consequently, there is concern that large-scale disasters will result in a severe shortage of appropriate bedding. This study aimed to determine whether air cushions can provide sufficient body pressure distribution and thermal insulation to serve as practical floor mats in evacuation shelters. Twenty healthy adults were enrolled in this randomized controlled crossover trial. Participants were instructed to lie on an air cushion, a urethane pad, and a plastic sheet, during which body pressure distribution was evaluated. Subjective perceptions of firmness and comfort were assessed using a numeric rating scale, and thermal insulation properties were evaluated by measuring surface temperature changes when each material was placed over a cooling gel pack. Compared with plastic sheets, the air cushion reduced mean body pressure by over 20% and increased contact area by more than 30%, with improvements exceeding those observed for urethane pads. Participants rated air cushions as significantly less firm and more comfortable than urethane pads. The air cushion also demonstrated thermal insulation comparable to urethane pads. These findings suggest that air cushions could serve as practical emergency floor mats in evacuation shelters, complementing cardboard beds and potentially reducing musculoskeletal strain and sleep disturbances in disaster settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.