Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051972›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2026

Choroidal nevus candidacy for monitoring in a virtual photoscreening pathway.

Rachael B Tessem, Rachel M Malsch, Lauren A Dalvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachael B TessemDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-5744-5952
Rachel M MalschDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lauren A DalvinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-4284

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the proportion of patients with choroidal nevus in an ocular oncology practice who would be suitable candidates for monitoring via a virtual photoscreening model, wherein imaging is asynchronously reviewed and longitudinally managed by an ocular oncologist.MethodsData were abstracted from the Prospective Ocular Tumor Study Database for all patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus from July 2019-October 2024. A stratification model for identification of virtual pathway candidates was defined and implemented as follows: good virtual pathway candidates included those with posteriorly located lesions for adequate photographic capture and no more than two high-risk features. Risk factors, outlined by the TFSOM-DIM acronym, included thickness >2 mm, presence of subretinal fluid, visual acuity 20/50 or worse, presence of orange pigment, low internal reflectivity, and basal diameter >5 mm. Of posteriorly located lesions, those with 0-2 risk factors were defined as good virtual pathway candidates, 3 risk factors as acceptable in select cases, and 4 or more as poor candidates.ResultsThere were 614 choroidal nevi in 586 patients diagnosed during the study period. Mean patient age at initial visit was 63.5 years old (median 66.1, range 5.8-94.8), with 59.4% female and 98.8% white. Analysis identified 436 (71%) nevi in 408 (69.6%) patients as good virtual pathway candidates, 53 (8.6%) nevi in 53 (9%) patients as potential candidates in select cases, and 125 (20.4%) nevi in 125 (21.3%) patients as poor candidates.ConclusionNearly 70% of patients with choroidal nevi followed by Mayo Clinic Ocular Oncology were identified as good candidates for follow-up via virtual photoscreening. This highlights the potential for improved clinical efficiency through virtual frameworks in ocular oncology.

Indexed as

Choroid NeoplasmsNevus, PigmentedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuitypreventive medicine/Screening < SOCIOECONOMICS AND EDUCATION IN MEDICINE/OPHTHALMOLOGYretinal pathology/Research < RETINAtelemedicine < SOCIOECONOMICS AND EDUCATION IN MEDICINE/OPHTHALMOLOGYTumors/Neoplasms < TUMORSuveal tumors < TUMORSuveal tumors < UVEA

Identifiers

PMID41051972
PMCPMC13261626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.