Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051966›Full record

ArticleKidney3602026

Association between Urinary Fractional Excretion of Potassium and Proteinuria Remission in Adult Nephrotic Syndrome.

Ryuto Yoshida, Takashin Nakayama, Ryunosuke Mitsuno, Motoaki Komatsu, Yoichi Oshima, Seiei Iwabuchi, Tomoaki Itoh, Dai Matsumoto, Ei Kusahana, Kenta Hoshi and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Ryuto YoshidaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-5247
Takashin NakayamaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2498-2793
Ryunosuke MitsunoDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0311-4508
Motoaki KomatsuDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-9106-2452
Yoichi OshimaDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-6329
Seiei IwabuchiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-5136-553
Tomoaki ItohDepartment of Nephrology, JCHO Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-0193-3298
Dai MatsumotoDepartment of Nephrology, JCHO Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Ei KusahanaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-1203-6485
Kenta HoshiDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sano Kosei General Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Kyosei NakamuraDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-7371-3223
Kentaro FujiiDepartment of Nephrology, Keiyu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshikazu HaraDepartment of Nephrology, Keiyu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takahisa KawaguchiDepartment of Nephrology, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-7168-7889
Koji FutatsugiDepartment of Nephrology, Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-970
Yasuyoshi YamajiDepartment of Nephrology, JCHO Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Hirobumi TokuyamaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-8715-2471
Marohito MurakamiDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sano Kosei General Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Chie TakimotoDepartment of Nephrology, Kawasaki Municipal Ida Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroto MatsudaDepartment of Nephrology, Keiyu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi AndoDepartment of Nephrology, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-9423-6422
Akinori HashiguchiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-071
Yuko KanekoDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2646-5765
Tatsuhiko AzegamiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4809-5788
Kaori HayashiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4923-1550

Funding

Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsElevated fractional excretion of potassium (FEK) at biopsy predicts a lower rate of proteinuria remission in adults with nephrotic syndrome. FEK levels vary by histologic types, being low in minimal change disease and high in diabetic kidney disease, suggesting diagnostic utility. FEK shows a dose-dependent link with remission, supporting its use as a simple prognostic biomarker.

backgroundReliable prognostic biomarkers of nephrotic syndrome (NS) are crucial for optimizing patient management. The fractional excretion of potassium (FEK) reflects net tubular potassium handling, but its association with prognosis in NS remains unexplored. We aimed to investigate the association between baseline FEK and proteinuria remission in adult NS.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across nine institutions in Japan. We enrolled adult patients diagnosed with NS who underwent a native kidney biopsy and had FEK between January 2012 and June 2022. Patients were categorized based on FEK levels and followed until the first complete remission of proteinuria.

resultsA total of 401 patients (median age, 61 years; 43% female) were included. Study participants were stratified into two groups based on the FEK cutoff value of 10%. Patients with high FEK had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of complete remission compared with those with low FEK ( P < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, high FEK was independently associated with a lower likelihood of complete remission (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.78). The trend of this association was observed across most subgroups, including those based on histologic diagnosis of minimal change disease and non-minimal change disease. Further stratification into four FEK categories revealed a progressive decline in remission rates with increasing FEK, indicating a dose-dependent relationship.

conclusionsElevated FEK is an independent predictor of a lower likelihood of proteinuria remission in Japanese adults with NS. FEK may serve as a readily accessible and valuable prognostic biomarker in the clinical management of NS.

Indexed as

Nephrotic SyndromePotassiumProteinuriaRenal EliminationAdultAgedBiomarkersBiopsyFemaleHumansJapanKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRemission InductionBiomarkersPotassiumnephrotic syndromeproteinuria

Identifiers

PMID41051966
PMCPMC13065186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.