ArticleACS macro letters2025
Multiscale Structure-Property Relationships in Gelatin-Based Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds.
Article in ACS macro letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthogonally crosslinked gelatin methacryloyl microgels for in situ assembly of granular hydrogel scaffolds.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Assembly of bioinspired multifunctional microspheres for enhanced alveolar bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Granular hydrogel scaffolds (GHS) are macroporous biomaterials composed of interlinked jammed hydrogel particles, particularly microgels. Each microgel is a crosslinked polymer network, typically with nanoscale pores. Among macromolecules, proteins such as gelatin and its derivatives are commonly used in GHS research, as their physicochemical characteristics and biological properties are well established. The hierarchical architecture of gelatin-based GHS, spanning from the nanoscale macromolecular network within microgels to jammed microgels with macroscale interstitial pores, provides modular control over the structural and functional properties of scaffolds, enabling unique biomedical applications. This Viewpoint highlights how gelatin chemistry at the molecular scale, microscale hydrogel particle design, and macroscale scaffold assembly regulate the overall behavior of gelatin-based GHS. At the molecular scale, the chemical composition of gelatin-based polymers modulates crosslinking mechanisms, degradation kinetics, and bioactivity, influencing microgel stability and mechanical behavior. At the microscale, particle size, stability, shape/porosity, and stiffness are key design factors that regulate GHS pore architecture, mechanical integrity, and cell- and tissue-biomaterial interactions, which, in turn, influence the overall properties of GHS at the macroscale. The interconnected macroporous network of GHS, tuned via microgel properties, guides cell infiltration and tissue integration, enabling applications in vascularization, immunomodulation, tissue regeneration, and 3D bioprinting. By mapping structure-property relationships from macromolecules to microgel features to scaffold properties, this Viewpoint may open new opportunities for the rational design and optimization of gelatin-based GHS for broad biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.