ReviewClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2026
The Role of Online Hemodiafiltration in Contemporary Kidney Care.
Review in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparable Efficacy of Medium Cut-Off Dialysis Plus HA130 Hemoadsorption and Postfilter Hemodiafiltration in Removing Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Phosphate-latest news and ongoing trials.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Membrane-to-Patient Optimization: Individualized Dialyzer Selection for Extracorporeal Dialysis.Toxins · 2026Review
- Advances in Membrane, Dialyzer Design, and Related Monitoring Technologies for Hemodiafiltration: Translating Bench-Side Innovations to Bedside Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic kidney disease as an active driver of digestive tract tumors: mechanistic insights and emerging management strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Innovation in daily hemodialysis: high-flux vs. hemodiafiltration.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Replacement of kidney function by dialysis maintains the lives of millions of patients. Clinical results however are still unsatisfactory with mortality rates and complications well above the matched control population. This has led to a continuous quest for more effective dialysis techniques and new biomaterials. In the 1980s, the production of synthetic membranes with higher water permeability ( i.e ., high flux) leveraged the development of techniques, such as hemodiafiltration (HDF), with improved solute removal, thanks to combination of diffusion and convection. Efficacy trials have demonstrated the superiority of HDF over high-flux hemodialysis for solute removal, hemodynamic tolerance, and survival. Consequently, the technique gained traction in Europe and Asia. In these trials, a minimum target convection volume ( i.e ., fluid replaced) of 23 L per session adjusted to body surface area (BSA, i.e ., 23 L multiplied by ratio of individual BSA normalized by 1.73 m 2 ) was required to maximize the benefit of the therapy. In general, the replacement fluid is delivered in the postfilter site, and to attain this target of 23 L adjusted to BSA, blood flows must be ≥350 ml/min, requiring 14-15 Gauge needles or ≥14 French catheters to avoid excessive hemoconcentration and circuit pressure issues. In its early days, the replacement solution was provided with sterile bags (offline), making the therapy costly and cumbersome. Online (OL), i.e ., real-time preparation of ultrapure fluid for replacement, has become the key to reduce cost and complexity, while making the technique (OL-HDF) safe and convenient. In the United States, however, existing regulations and concerns about safety prevented approval for clinical use. In 2024, OL-HDF has received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in the United States, and this opens new options and perspectives in the management of people living with kidney failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.