Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051878›Full record

ReviewClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2026

The Role of Online Hemodiafiltration in Contemporary Kidney Care.

Claudio Ronco, Francisco Maduell, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, Magdalena Madero, Thiago Reis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phosphate-latest news and ongoing trials.Clinical kidney journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudio RoncoDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-4065
Francisco MaduellDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1673-0353
Kamyar Kalantar-ZadehDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension and Transplantation, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-0725
Magdalena MaderoDivision of Nephrology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Thiago ReisDivision of Nephrology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7071-117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacement of kidney function by dialysis maintains the lives of millions of patients. Clinical results however are still unsatisfactory with mortality rates and complications well above the matched control population. This has led to a continuous quest for more effective dialysis techniques and new biomaterials. In the 1980s, the production of synthetic membranes with higher water permeability ( i.e ., high flux) leveraged the development of techniques, such as hemodiafiltration (HDF), with improved solute removal, thanks to combination of diffusion and convection. Efficacy trials have demonstrated the superiority of HDF over high-flux hemodialysis for solute removal, hemodynamic tolerance, and survival. Consequently, the technique gained traction in Europe and Asia. In these trials, a minimum target convection volume ( i.e ., fluid replaced) of 23 L per session adjusted to body surface area (BSA, i.e ., 23 L multiplied by ratio of individual BSA normalized by 1.73 m 2 ) was required to maximize the benefit of the therapy. In general, the replacement fluid is delivered in the postfilter site, and to attain this target of 23 L adjusted to BSA, blood flows must be ≥350 ml/min, requiring 14-15 Gauge needles or ≥14 French catheters to avoid excessive hemoconcentration and circuit pressure issues. In its early days, the replacement solution was provided with sterile bags (offline), making the therapy costly and cumbersome. Online (OL), i.e ., real-time preparation of ultrapure fluid for replacement, has become the key to reduce cost and complexity, while making the technique (OL-HDF) safe and convenient. In the United States, however, existing regulations and concerns about safety prevented approval for clinical use. In 2024, OL-HDF has received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in the United States, and this opens new options and perspectives in the management of people living with kidney failure.

Indexed as

HemodiafiltrationHumansMembranes, ArtificialTreatment OutcomeMembranes, Artificialchronic kidney failuredialysishemodialysishemodialysis adequacyrenal failureultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID41051878
PMCPMC13268393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.