ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Electron Affinities from Equation-of-Motion Frozen Pair-Type Coupled Cluster Methods and Their Dependence on Single Excitations, Molecular Orbitals, and Basis Set Sizes.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Flexible, Automated, and Basis-Set-Insensitive Domain-Based Charge-Transfer Decomposition for Correlated Wave Functions and Its Application to Inter- and Intramolecular Cases.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Ionization Potentials at Mean-Field Computational Cost: The Extended Koopmans' Framework for pCCD.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a series of alternative electron affinity equation-of-motion frozen-pair coupled cluster (EA-EOM-fpCC) methods for computing electron affinities and open-shell electronic structures. These methods are systematically benchmarked against the reference Δ-CCSD(T) approach and experimental data for a representative molecular data set using natural pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) orbitals and various basis set sizes. A comparison to canonical CC methods is also discussed. Additionally, EA-EOM-fpCC results are compared with those derived from the difference between double and single ionization potentials (DIP-EOM-CC and IP-EOM-CC) of dicationic species within the same ground-state fpCC reference framework. Our results demonstrate that frozen-pair approaches significantly reduce computational costs while maintaining high accuracy, offering an efficient strategy for studying electron affinities and open-shell systems in large molecules. The IP/DIP-EOM-fp(L)CCSD model stood out as the best post-pCCD flavor to predict EAs, achieving a mean error of 0.09 eV compared to experimental results, while EA-EOM-fpCCD is closest to Δ-CCSD(T) reference data. Finally, diffuse functions are not recommended for EA calculations using the IP/DIP-EOM-fpCC recipe and are not required for the EA-EOM-fpCC variants if sufficiently large basis sets are employed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.