Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051790›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Electron Affinities from Equation-of-Motion Frozen Pair-Type Coupled Cluster Methods and Their Dependence on Single Excitations, Molecular Orbitals, and Basis Set Sizes.

Saman Behjou, Paweł Tecmer, Katharina Boguslawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saman BehjouInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Grudziądzka 5, Toruń 87-100, Poland.
Paweł TecmerInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Grudziądzka 5, Toruń 87-100, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6347-878X
Katharina BoguslawskiInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Grudziądzka 5, Toruń 87-100, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-1151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a series of alternative electron affinity equation-of-motion frozen-pair coupled cluster (EA-EOM-fpCC) methods for computing electron affinities and open-shell electronic structures. These methods are systematically benchmarked against the reference Δ-CCSD(T) approach and experimental data for a representative molecular data set using natural pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) orbitals and various basis set sizes. A comparison to canonical CC methods is also discussed. Additionally, EA-EOM-fpCC results are compared with those derived from the difference between double and single ionization potentials (DIP-EOM-CC and IP-EOM-CC) of dicationic species within the same ground-state fpCC reference framework. Our results demonstrate that frozen-pair approaches significantly reduce computational costs while maintaining high accuracy, offering an efficient strategy for studying electron affinities and open-shell systems in large molecules. The IP/DIP-EOM-fp(L)CCSD model stood out as the best post-pCCD flavor to predict EAs, achieving a mean error of 0.09 eV compared to experimental results, while EA-EOM-fpCCD is closest to Δ-CCSD(T) reference data. Finally, diffuse functions are not recommended for EA calculations using the IP/DIP-EOM-fpCC recipe and are not required for the EA-EOM-fpCC variants if sufficiently large basis sets are employed.

Identifiers

PMID41051790
PMCPMC12573755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.