Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051700›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for fetal and placental assessment: evidence, safety, and a roadmap for clinical translation.

Alushika Jain, Rajasbhala P Dhande, Pratapsingh H Parihar, Shivali Kashikar, Nishant Raj, Amit Toshniwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alushika JainDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India. alushika23@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2433-041X
Rajasbhala P DhandeDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India.
Pratapsingh H PariharDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India.
Shivali KashikarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India.
Nishant RajDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India.
Amit ToshniwalDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal growth restriction (FGR), preeclampsia, and other placental disorders are leading contributors to perinatal morbidity and mortality, primarily due to impaired uteroplacental perfusion. Existing imaging modalities, such as Doppler ultrasound and fetal MRI, provide indirect or limited functional insights into placental and fetal perfusion, constraining timely clinical intervention.

objectiveTo evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a promising, safe, and real-time tool for assessing placental perfusion and its potential application in maternal-fetal medicine through comprehensive analysis of methodological parameters, safety profiles, and emerging computational techniques.

methodsA comprehensive synthesis of preclinical and clinical studies was conducted, focusing on the safety, efficacy, and current use of CEUS in pregnancy. Key findings were drawn from animal models (rats, sheep, macaques) and human studies involving 256 pregnant individuals, with detailed analysis of imaging protocols, contrast agent characteristics, and quantification methods.

resultsCEUS utilizes intravascular microbubble contrast agents (1-8 μm diameter) that do not cross the placental barrier, enabling safe maternal imaging. However, size distribution analysis reveals sub-micron populations (8-20% by number) requiring careful evaluation. Preclinical models confirm CEUS ability to detect placental perfusion Changes with 54% reduction in perfusion index following uterine artery ligation (p < 0.001). Human studies demonstrate zero clinically significant adverse events among 256 cases, though critical gaps exist including absent biomarker monitoring and long-term follow-up. Emerging AI-enhanced analysis achieves 73-86% diagnostic accuracy using ensemble deep learning architectures. Current limitations include significant protocol heterogeneity (MI 0.05-0.19, frequency 2-9 MHz) and absence of standardization.

conclusionCEUS presents a compelling solution for perfusion imaging in pregnancy, offering functional, bedside imaging without fetal exposure to contrast agents. However, methodological limitations, knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes, and the distinction between conventional microbubbles and emerging nanobubble formulations demand systematic research investment. Clinical translation requires standardized protocols, comprehensive safety monitoring including biomarker assessment, ethical oversight, and long-term outcome studies to support integration into routine obstetric care.

Indexed as

Contrast-enhanced ultrasoundFetal growth restrictionMaternal-fetal medicineMicrobubblesPlacental perfusionPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID41051700
PMCPMC12501096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.