ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for fetal and placental assessment: evidence, safety, and a roadmap for clinical translation.
Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sound of nurturing: Advanced photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging of placental hemodynamics.Placenta · 2026Article
- The Role of CEUS in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pleuropulmonary Diseases and Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The gut microbiota-immune-brain axis in post-traumatic stress disorder: mechanistic integration and translational prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFetal growth restriction (FGR), preeclampsia, and other placental disorders are leading contributors to perinatal morbidity and mortality, primarily due to impaired uteroplacental perfusion. Existing imaging modalities, such as Doppler ultrasound and fetal MRI, provide indirect or limited functional insights into placental and fetal perfusion, constraining timely clinical intervention.
objectiveTo evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a promising, safe, and real-time tool for assessing placental perfusion and its potential application in maternal-fetal medicine through comprehensive analysis of methodological parameters, safety profiles, and emerging computational techniques.
methodsA comprehensive synthesis of preclinical and clinical studies was conducted, focusing on the safety, efficacy, and current use of CEUS in pregnancy. Key findings were drawn from animal models (rats, sheep, macaques) and human studies involving 256 pregnant individuals, with detailed analysis of imaging protocols, contrast agent characteristics, and quantification methods.
resultsCEUS utilizes intravascular microbubble contrast agents (1-8 μm diameter) that do not cross the placental barrier, enabling safe maternal imaging. However, size distribution analysis reveals sub-micron populations (8-20% by number) requiring careful evaluation. Preclinical models confirm CEUS ability to detect placental perfusion Changes with 54% reduction in perfusion index following uterine artery ligation (p < 0.001). Human studies demonstrate zero clinically significant adverse events among 256 cases, though critical gaps exist including absent biomarker monitoring and long-term follow-up. Emerging AI-enhanced analysis achieves 73-86% diagnostic accuracy using ensemble deep learning architectures. Current limitations include significant protocol heterogeneity (MI 0.05-0.19, frequency 2-9 MHz) and absence of standardization.
conclusionCEUS presents a compelling solution for perfusion imaging in pregnancy, offering functional, bedside imaging without fetal exposure to contrast agents. However, methodological limitations, knowledge gaps regarding long-term outcomes, and the distinction between conventional microbubbles and emerging nanobubble formulations demand systematic research investment. Clinical translation requires standardized protocols, comprehensive safety monitoring including biomarker assessment, ethical oversight, and long-term outcome studies to support integration into routine obstetric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.