ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Whole-body dynamic FDG-PET/CT parametric imaging in alveolar echinococcosis.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whole-body Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the role of whole-body dynamic (WBD)/Patlak parametric
methodsWe prospectively analyzed 20 PET/CT datasets performed for staging or therapy monitoring in patients with confirmed AE. Dynamic and standard static PET/CT datasets were acquired in all patients, and quantitative imaging parameters were measured in the lesion with the highest uptake (i.e., maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Patlak parameters) and compared to normal liver tissue (SUVratio and Patlak ratio).
resultsMean SUVmax in AE manifestations was 5.7 ± 3.1 (3.2-13.9), compared to 3.2 ± 0.4 (2.5-4.2) in non-infected liver tissue, respective values for Patlak were 13.0 ± 8.6 (2.7-35.5) and 4.9 ± 2.8 (0.6-12.1). SUVratio (1.8 ± 1.1; 1.0-5.2) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than Patlak ratio (3.2 ± 3.2; 1.1-15.6). Both ratios correlated significantly with E. granulosus hydatid fluid (EgHF) antibodies (SUVratio r = 0.73, P < 0.001; Patlak ratio r = 0.85, P < 0.001).
conclusionWBD PET/CT yields higher lesion-to-background contrast and may, therefore, have the potential to increase sensitivity in the assessment of hepatic AE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.