ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
AI-driven protein pocket detection through integrating deep Q-networks for structural analysis.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MGF110-2L deletion prevents IFN-I and inflammatory response, resulting in partial attenuation and protection against virulent ASFV.Journal of virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein pockets, or small cavities on the protein surface, are critical sites for enzymatic catalysis, molecular recognition, and drug binding. Accurately identifying these pockets is crucial for understanding protein function and designing therapeutic interventions. Traditional computational methods such as molecular docking, surface grid mapping, and molecular dynamics simulations are hampered by the use of fixed protein structures, and therefore it is challenging to identify cryptic pockets when they appear under physiological conditions. We propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) technique based on deep Q-networks (DQN) to identify precise protein pockets. Our strategy to improve the prediction of functional binding sites incorporates important molecular descriptors such as spatial coordinates, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), hydrophobicity, and electrostatic charge. We pre-process protein structure data from the protein data bank (PDB) through feature extraction and selection methods, including variance threshold filtering and dimensionality reduction using an autoencoder. The sparse feature representation enables efficient training of a DQN agent, which navigates protein surfaces and iteratively optimizes pocket predictions. By using reinforcement learning concepts, the model adapts its pocket detection strategy according to the learned reward signals, increasing sensitivity and specificity. The method is tested on benchmark datasets and is found to exhibit superior performance in detecting well-defined and cryptic pockets over traditional computational methods. Experimental evidence suggests that our model successfully identifies binding sites in various protein families, with significant implications for drug discovery and protein-ligand interaction studies. Moreover, the model's ability to incorporate geometric and biochemical features allows for a better understanding of pocket functionality. The scalability of our method makes it an important tool for large-scale virtual screening and personalized medicine. By using deep reinforcement learning, this research provides a new and effective framework for protein pocket prediction, opening up opportunities for developing new tools in structural bioinformatics, drug design, and molecular biology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41051642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.