ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Tooth segmentation and dental crowding diagnosis using two-stage dual-dilated graph convolution.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTooth segmentation and diagnosis of dental crowding severity on 3D intraoral scan models are key processes for computer-aided analysis of orthodontic models. Conventional methods are time-consuming, inefficient, and subjective, necessitating more efficient and intelligent approaches. Therefore, we propose a two-stage intelligent workflow.
methodsIn Stage 1, tooth segmentation is performed using an innovative dual-dilated graph convolutional network 1 (DDGCNet1). In Stage 2, Stage 1's output is converted to a point cloud, then processed by DDGCNet2 and post-processing to generate arch length discrepancy (ALD, an indicator of dental crowding). The encoding layers of the proposed networks embed a novel dual-dilated EdgeConv module, effectively learning from local features and long-range contextual information of adjacent teeth.
resultsExperimental comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed network achieves outstanding segmentation performance and accurate dental crowding diagnosis. In ALD measurement, it attains a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.553 mm for the maxilla and 1.434 mm for the mandible.
conclusionThis study can assist orthodontists in diagnosis and treatment, alleviate their workload, and expedite the development of reliable orthodontic treatment plans, thereby meeting the demands of computer-aided orthodontic diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41051625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.