ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
The Significance of Type A Botulinum Toxin Ten-Point Injection Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Caused by Muscle Spasms in Women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic impact of botulinum toxin type A trigger point injection therapy and ten-point injection therapy for chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) caused by muscle spasm, while also exploring the efficacy and clinical significance of botulinum toxin type A ten-point injection therapy in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.
methodsThis study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized at a tertiary hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 who were diagnosed with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) caused by pelvic floor muscle spasm. On the basis of the treatment protocol, these patients were divided into the trigger point pelvic floor muscle injection group and the ten-point injection therapy group, with data collected through follow-up visits or telephone interviews. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, including age, body mass index (BMI), pain intensity (assessed using the Facial Pain Scale-Revised [FPS-R]), Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance significant differences in general characteristics between the two groups at a 1:1 ratio. Among the 91 patients, 44 received trigger point pelvic floor muscle injection therapy, and 47 received ten-point injection therapy. PSM successfully matched 64 patients, with 32 in each group.
resultsAmong the 91 patients, 64 were successfully matched using the PSM method, divided into two groups of 32 patients each. The baseline characteristics of the patients in each group were well matched, with all showing (P > 0.05). Postoperative follow-up data indicated that both groups of patients showed a synchronous improvement trend in pain relief, anxiety improvement, and quality of life enhancement, with no statistically significant differences at any time point. This suggests that both injection methods have similar efficacy in improving clinical symptoms and quality of life in patients with chronic pelvic pain caused by muscle spasm.
conclusionBoth the ten-point injection method and trigger point injection method using type A botulinum toxin demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy in treating chronic pelvic pain caused by pelvic floor muscle spasm. However, the ten-point injection method has significant advantages in terms of not relying on trigger point localization, having a relatively fixed operational process, a shorter learning curve, less time-consuming procedures, and causing less discomfort to patients, which supports its broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.