Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051564›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

The Prognostic Significance of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte in Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.

Xin Meng, Cong Wang, Xin Xu, Ning Zhang, Xiaoqin Wang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Trajectories of postoperative nutritional risk changes in patients with oesophageal cancer and their relationship with symptom recovery-a multicentre longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin MengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Cong WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Xin XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqin WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China. wxq1493722680@xjtufh.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis comprehensive review sought to investigate the correlation between PLR and LMR with overall longevity (OS), recurrence-free interval (DFS), and malignancy-related survival (CSS) among individuals diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma.

methodsA comprehensive review of relevant studies was carried out using prominent digital repositories to locate research articles that provided hazard estimates (HRs) for PLR and LMR in individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Potential publication bias was examined through graphical funnel plot assessments, while additional subgroup analyses were conducted based on patient demographics and consideration of C-index.

resultsNineteen studies were included for PLR and OS analysis, showing that high PLR was associated with increased mortality risk (HR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.04-1.44, p = 0.01). For LMR and OS, 14 studies were analyzed, indicating that low LMR was linked to higher mortality risk (HR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.29-2.06, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed stronger associations in the western population and studies with C-index adjustments. Regarding DFS, no significant association was found with PLR (HR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.93-1.40, p = 0.21), while low LMR increased recurrence risk (HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.15-1.48, p < 0.0001). High PLR and low LMR were associated with worse CSS, with no significant heterogeneity observed.

conclusionElevated PLR and reduced LMR are linked to unfavorable survival prospects in individuals with colon malignancy.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsColorectal NeoplasmsLymphocytesMonocytesHumansLymphocyte CountPlatelet CountPrognosisColorectal cancerLMRMeta-analysisPLRPrognosisSurvival outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.