ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Strong agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained bowel function score in patients with Hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformation.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Strong agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained bowel function score in patients with hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformation".Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Bowel Function Score (BFS) questionnaire is the most widely utilized tool for assessing bowel function in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) or anorectal malformation (ARM). However, the questionnaire has not undergone a formal validation process. This study aimed to compare self-administered responses with those obtained during clinical consultations to determine whether patients can reliably report their bowel function when completing the questionnaire independently.
methods"Patients with HD or ARM and/or with their parents, completed the BFS questionnaire prior to their outpatient clinic visit. During consultations, the questionnaires were reviewed, with any missing or unclear responses addressed and adjustments recorded. The agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained BFS scores was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)."
resultsA total of 103 questionnaires with 721 answered questions were evaluated. The agreement between self-administered and interview-based BFS scores was found to be nearly perfect (ICC) 0.96. The question recording frequency of defecation, was the only item that did not demonstrate perfect agreement.
conclusionThis study supports the use of the self-administered BFS questionnaire as a reliable tool for assessing bowel function in HD and ARM patients in both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.