ArticleHerz2026
Electrical-mechanical dyssynchrony in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Herz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study focused on exploring the correlation between the electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony of the right ventricle (RV) in patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PcPH). It also aimed to compare the predictive capabilities of these dyssynchronies for risk stratification.
methodsFrom April 2017 to March 2018, PcPH patients at Fuwai Hospital were consecutively enrolled. They were divided into low-risk and non-low-risk groups according to the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Off-line software (GE EchoPAC version 201) was used to measure RV mechanical dyssynchrony (standard deviation of the time from QRS onset to peak strain for the six RV segments [RV-SD6]), while QRS duration representing electrical dyssynchrony was measured manually.
resultsIn total, 66 PcPH patients (average 35 years, 19 males and 47 females) were enrolled, 37 in the low-risk group and 29 in the non-low-risk group. QRS duration was significantly correlated with RV-SD6 (r = 0.25, p = 0.047). Both RV-SD6 and QRS duration were significantly correlated with N‑terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels (r = 0.44, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.26, p = 0.039). Furthermore, RV-SD6 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.87, p < 0.001) and QRS duration (AUC: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52-0.78, p = 0.036) had the potential to predict non-low-risk stratification. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified RV-SD6 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, p = 0.009) and QRS duration (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.15, p = 0.045) as independent predictors of non-low-risk PcPH.
conclusionMechanical dyssynchrony presented by RV-SD6 correlates with QRS duration and better predicts risk stratification in PcPH patients without complete bundle branch block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41051528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.