ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Alpha-internexin as a brain-specific neurodegeneration marker: development and validation of a novel CSF assay.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlpha-internexin (AINX) is a type IV intermediate filament alongside the neurofilament triplet proteins and periferin. Despite its homologies, the key difference is that AINX is central nervous system-specific. The purpose of this study was to develop an immunoassay for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AINX, quantify it in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, and compare its diagnostic performance with neurofilament light (NfL).
methodsMonoclonal antibodies were generated and characterized by immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry and ELISA, for specificity to the target analyte and cross-reactivity. Single molecule array (Simoa) technology was the selected platform for assay development. The assay was validated according to pre-established parameters and AINX performance as a biomarker was tested in two independent cohorts (Gothenburg and University College London).
resultsTwo highly specific antibodies were generated (B15 and Ina1) and used to develop a robust assay in all analytical validation parameters tested. The quantitative range of the assay was 0.137-140 pg/mL. In the Gothenburg cohort, AINX and NfL showed similar diagnostic performance, but the correlation between biomarkers was diagnosis dependent. In the University College London cohort, AINX and NfL showed similar trends across the different neurodegenerative diseases, with strong correlation between markers.
conclusionsWe developed a highly sensitive and specific immunoassay for AINX in CSF. AINX showed similar diagnostic performance and high correlation with CSF NfL. Further research should focus on describing its role in specific disorders, as well as evaluate its potential as a blood-based biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.