Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051508›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[The assessment of dietary supplements from the perspective of food control authorities in Schleswig-Holstein].

Angelika Krüger, Erika Paschke

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelika KrügerLandeslabor Schleswig-Holstein, Max-Eyth-Str. 5, 24537, Neumünster, Deutschland.
Erika PaschkeLandeslabor Schleswig-Holstein, Max-Eyth-Str. 5, 24537, Neumünster, Deutschland. erika.paschke@lsh.landsh.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food supplements serve to provide people with additional nutrients, primarily vitamins and minerals. Currently, numerous food supplements are coming onto the market that do not comply with legal requirements and are advertised with unsubstantiated health claims. Since the Food Supplements Regulation (NemV) came into force in 2004, the Landeslabor Schleswig-Holstein has been responsible for testing and assessing food supplements and acts as a competence centre within the North German Cooperation.This article summarises the organisation of food supplement monitoring using Schleswig-Holstein as an example and then discusses the legal requirements. Particular emphasis is placed on the need to set maximum quantities and on the regulation of botanicals. The distinction between medicinal products and novel foods is also explained. Finally, the article takes a closer look at unauthorised health claims on products for advertising purposes.In practice, despite existing legal requirements, there is a need for further regulation. Legal disputes could be avoided if distributors of food supplements consistently complied with the legal requirements that serve to protect consumers from health risks.

Indexed as

Consumer Product SafetyDietary SupplementsFood AnalysisLegislation, FoodGermanyHumansDifferentiation from pharmaceuticalsFood Supplements RegulationHealth claimsNovel foodOrganisation of monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41051508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.