Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051505›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Radiological imaging of spinal trauma in special situations].

Umut Yilmaz, Malvina Garner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umut Yilmaz
Malvina GarnerKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg Saar, Deutschland. malvina.garner@uks.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal trauma is rare but associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Its diagnostic evaluation poses significant challenges for radiologists, particularly in specific patient groups and clinical scenarios. This review article highlights the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in acute and specialized imaging of spinal trauma under particular circumstances. Special attention is given to pediatric injuries, normal variants (e.g., pseudosubluxation, os odontoideum), discoligamentous injuries, age- and medication-related osteoporotic fractures, imaging in pregnant patients with strict radiation protection requirements, as well as complex situations such as polytrauma, traumatic brain injury, or coagulopathies. In addition, pathological fractures caused by tumors or infections and imaging in postoperative patients are discussed. Classification systems such as Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS), AO Spine score, Osteoporotic Fracture (OF) score, and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) provide a structured basis for therapeutic decision-making. Radiologists play a key role, as imaging not only makes the diagnosis, but also directly influences classification and treatment planning. Future developments such as AI-supported fracture detection, dual-energy CT and artefact-reduced MRI sequences will further improve diagnostics.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal InjuriesTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildFemaleHumansPregnancySpinal FracturesClassificationComputed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingPolytraumaSpinal fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.