ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Machine learning-assisted classification of lung cancer: the role of sarcopenia, inflammatory biomarkers, and PET/CT anatomical-metabolic parameters.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate differentiation between non-cancerous, benign, and malignant lung cancer remains a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping clinical and imaging characteristics. This study proposes a multimodal machine learning (ML) framework integrating positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) anatomic-metabolic parameters, sarcopenia markers, and inflammatory biomarkers to enhance classification performance in lung cancer. A retrospective dataset of 222 patients was analyzed, including demographic variables, functional and morphometric sarcopenia indices, hematological inflammation markers, and PET/CT derived parameters such as maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Five ML algorithms-Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Random Forest-were evaluated using standardized performance metrics. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique was applied to balance class distributions. Feature importance analysis was conducted using the optimal model, and classification was repeated using the top 15 features. Among the models, Random Forest demonstrated superior predictive performance with a test accuracy of 96%, precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.96, and an average AUC of 0.99. Feature importance analysis revealed SUVmax, SUVmean, total lesion glycolysis, and skeletal muscle index as leading predictors. A secondary classification using only the top 15 features yielded even higher test accuracy (97%). These findings underscore the potential of integrating metabolic imaging, physical function, and biochemical inflammation markers in a non-invasive ML-based diagnostic pipeline. The proposed framework demonstrates high accuracy and generalizability and may serve as an effective clinical decision support tool in early lung cancer diagnosis and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41051469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.