ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Associations Between Altered Auditory EEG Markers and Clinical Impairments in Fragile X Syndrome.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIndividuals with Fragile X syndrome (FXS) manifest clinical impairments in several domains. Previous research has shown that auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), measured using electroencephalogram (EEG), are altered in FXS, but the associations between these alterations and the symptoms observed in FXS have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to compare AEP markers between individuals with FXS and neurotypical (NT) controls, with the main purpose of exploring how these markers are related to various clinical symptoms present in FXS.
methodsA passive auditory oddball paradigm was presented. P1, N1, P2, N2, P3 and mismatch negativity (MMN) amplitudes and latencies were compared between 41 children and adults with FXS and 46 age-matched NT controls. Amplitudes and latencies, as well as habituation and change detection effects were compared between the groups using mixed design ANOVAs. Pearson correlations were then performed to explore associations between AEP markers and symptoms in the FXS group.
resultsOur results showed that FXS participants had increased N1, P2 and MMN amplitudes and latencies, as well as lack of habituation and change detection effects compared to NT controls. Our correlational analyses revealed several associations between AEPs and phenotypic manifestations; notably, associations between exaggerated N1 and P2 amplitudes and more severe autistic and ADHD symptoms.
conclusionsThese findings confirm that abnormalities of the N1 and P2 components are robust biomarkers of altered sensory processing in FXS and suggest that these alterations may present a dose-response relation to clinical impairments in FXS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.