Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41051405›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Empowering outpatients with breast cancer: The impact of a Continuous Care Program on self-efficacy-a randomized clinical trial.

Mina Moafi, Sarieh Poortaghi, Violeta Lopez, Marjan Delkhosh, Payam Emami, Shima Haghani, Ramesh Omranipoor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mina MoafiDepartment of Community Health and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1293-2828
Sarieh PoortaghiDepartment of Community Health and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. S-poortaghi@tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-2353
Violeta LopezSchool of Nursing and Allied Medical Sciences, Holy Angel University, Angeles, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-0331
Marjan DelkhoshDepartment of Community Health and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-3990
Payam EmamiDepartment of Emergency Medical Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-7539
Shima HaghaniBiostatistics Nursing Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-975X
Ramesh OmranipoorDepartment of Surgical Oncology, , Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-9875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women globally and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Continuous care programs offer ongoing support and education, potentially enhancing self-efficacy in women with breast cancer and consequently improving their quality of life. This study investigated the effect of a continuous care program on the self-efficacy of women with breast cancer in Iran.

methodsA randomized clinical trial was employed involving 76 women aged 20-60 diagnosed with stage two, three, or four breast cancer at the breast clinic of the cancer institute in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, during September-January 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group, each comprising 38 individuals, through random block assignment. The intervention group received a four-session Continuing Care Program (CCP), while the control group received routine care. Data were collected using a researcher-created demographic questionnaire and a breast cancer-specific self-efficacy questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 20 software.

resultsThe results of the study indicated a statistically significant difference in self-efficacy post-intervention with higher levels observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < .001). The paired t-test results demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the mean self-efficacy scores and all its dimensions post-intervention compared to pre-intervention (p < .001). A statistically significant decrease in self-efficacy related to problem-solving skills was observed in the control group post-intervention compared to pre-intervention (p = .005), and the average self-efficacy score in this group also significantly decreased post-intervention (p = .023).

conclusionThe study found that the CCP is effective in enhancing the self-efficacy of women with breast cancer in Iran. This program can be a beneficial method for improving patients' well-being and delivering appropriate care to this population. The program can be shared with nurses in oncology departments to help them tailor their care plans by understanding the importance of continuity in care planning. Clinical trial registration This research was registered (26/09/2023) in the https://www.irct.ir with registration number (IRCT20230622905861) by the Clinical Trial Registration Center of Iran.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsContinuity of Patient CareOutpatientsSelf EfficacyAdultFemaleHumansIranMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBreast cancerContinuity of care planOutpatientsPatient empowermentRandomized clinical trialSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.