ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Mapping a path forward: addressing disease burden, pathways and solutions in ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the burden of ANCA-associated vasculitis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Mapping a path forward: addressing disease burden, pathways and solutions in ANCA-associated vasculitis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Addressing clinical challenges in ANCA-associated vasculitis with real-world evidence.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a frequently relapsing systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation and destruction of small- to medium-sized blood vessels resulting in potentially life-threatening organ damage. Of the three AAV subtypes, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are the most common. The aims of treatment are to rapidly control active disease with induction therapy [typically rituximab (RTX) (the new standard-of-care) or cyclophosphamide alongside glucocorticoids (GC) and avacopan], followed by less aggressive maintenance strategies to reduce the risk of relapse. International and national guidelines for the treatment of GPA/MPA are generally aligned, with all guidelines highlighting a need to reduce treatment-related adverse events through rapid GC tapering and the use of GC-sparing avacopan treatment. Guidelines will continue to evolve as ongoing studies provide new insights into alternative (GC-sparing) treatment options and optimal RTX-based treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.