ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2025
Combination detection of IgG- and IgA-related autoantibodies for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAutoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are promising noninvasive cancer biomarkers due to their specificity and stability. Gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis often requires invasive procedures, emphasizing the need for reliable blood-based biomarkers.ObjectiveThis study assessed whether serum IgG and IgA autoantibodies, individually or combined, could serve as noninvasive biomarkers for gastric cancer.Experimental designWe analyzed 27 autoantibodies in serum from 265 healthy controls, 296 GC patients, and 195 gastritis patients using protein microarray. Autoantibody levels and the IgG/IgA ratio were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.ResultsWe identified 24 differentially expressed autoantibodies (DEAs) for IgA and 17 for IgG between GC patients and controls. In distinguishing GC from gastritis, 20 DEAs for IgA and 23 for IgG were significant. The IgG/IgA ratio of MIP1 beta had the highest diagnostic performance between atrophic gastritis and GC, while MMP7 was the most effective between chronic gastritis and GC. The gbm model with 14 autoantibodies had the highest Youden's index for GC versus controls, and a 13-autoantibody model performed best for GC versus all gastritis.ConclusionsSpecific panels of autoantibodies could serve as noninvasive diagnostic tools for distinguishing GC from controls and gastritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.