ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Receiving Trifluridine/Tipiracil: A Real-World UK Retrospective Review.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Danish randomized trial of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival andESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionTrifluridine-tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This UK real-world retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to prevent FTD/TPI induced neutropenia in patients with mCRC.MethodsRetrospective data were collected across five UK Healthcare sites. Consecutive patients with mCRC having received at least 2 cycles of FTD/TPI in addition to G-CSF administered as primary or secondary prophylaxis were included. The study assessed the timing and duration of G-CSF treatment, incidence of neutropenia, and subsequent dose delays/reductions. Time on FTD/TPI treatment, Progression free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS) were also calculated for this patient cohort.ResultsThe data set included 55 mCRC patients in total; 25 receiving primary prophylaxis, and 30 receiving secondary prophylaxis. 68% of G-CSF prophylaxis commenced on day 15, with 99% initiated between days 14 and 22. Following G-CSF use, 25% of patients experienced a dose delay and 18% a dose reduction due to neutropenia. 14.5% of patients reported grade ≥3 neutropenia. In patients receiving primary prophylaxis a mean of 18.4 weeks of FTD/TPI were completed, whereas in those receiving secondary prophylaxis the mean was 28.8 weeks. Primary prophylaxis patients exhibited a median PFS of 3 months, and a median OS of 9.7 months. In secondary prophylaxis patients the median PFS was 7.2 months and the median OS 17.5 months.ConclusionG-CSF prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenia, improved dose intensity, and extended PFS and OS in this real-world study of mCRC patients on FTD/TPI. G-CSF prophylaxis was commonly administered as a 5-day course of filgrastim starting on day 15.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.