ReviewActa ophthalmologica2025
Factors associated with the high prevalence of myopia and its decrease-A historical review.
Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroeconomics and myopia prevention: A framework for public health intervention.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Review
- Analysis of the factors influencing the treatment zone area after overnight orthokeratology lens wearing.Journal of optometry · 2026Article
- Myopia Trends in Europe: A Reappraisal of Current Evidence.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Display color gamut as a spectral risk factor for myopia: a unifying hypothesis linking chromatic emmetropization, cone circuitry dysfunction, and the spectral deficiency of digital screens.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the high prevalence of myopia and its decrease-A historical review.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Review
- Time outdoors and the prevention of myopia: School-based implementation works.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo review historical and recent studies on the epidemiology of myopia, identify the factors associated with its prevalence and determine how myopia has been successfully prevented.
methodsHistorical and recent publications were reviewed regarding factors associated with the prevalence of myopia and the success of myopia prevention. Among the historical studies, Herman Cohn's studies in Germany and Johan Widmark's studies in Sweden were referenced and compared.
resultsIn the 1800s, the prevalence of myopia caused by school glasses was high in the upper grades of many schools in Germany and Sweden. In Germany, the mean prevalence of myopia in the upper grades of 24 schools was 58%, exceeding 70% in several schools. At the same time in Sweden, the corresponding average prevalence was 45%, with the highest prevalence of 65%. Germany and Sweden implemented several generally accepted reforms to reduce the educational burden of schooling. Widmark compared the prevalence of myopia in the same schools in Sweden between the periods 1822-1883 and 1904-1905. The mean myopia prevalence decreased from 22.2% to 9.8%, and from 45.3% to 17.4% in the highest grades of these schools. Widmark identified three factors to explain the decrease in myopia prevalence: (1) improved lighting due to electric lights; (2) Fraktur fonts in schools were replaced by Antiqua; and (3) the number of outdoor activities was increased. The discussion aims to find similarities between Cohn's and Widmark's studies and the current myopia boom and to describe how these historical observations might currently be used to prevent myopia.
conclusionMyopia generally begins after starting school. The younger the children are subjected to the strain caused by near work and the less time spent outdoors at school, the higher the prevalence of myopia and the higher the myopia in adulthood. To control the current myopia boom in countries where the prevalence is highest, major changes should be implemented in the education system to reduce the need for near work and increase the time children spend outdoors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.