ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Disparities and Barriers to Care in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for Native American and First Nations Populations.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: American Indian and Alaska Native and First Nations populations face well-documented health disparities, yet inequities in access to plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) remain underrecognized. These communities experience a higher burden of PRS-relevant conditions, including orofacial clefts, trauma, burns, and postoncological defects, but disproportionately low usage of PRS services. Methods: This narrative synthesizes existing literature on disparities in PRS access for Indigenous populations in the United States and Canada. The key focus areas included disease prevalence, barriers to care, and proposed strategies for improving access. Peer-reviewed articles and policy sources were reviewed to identify recurring themes and evidence-based solutions. Results: Indigenous patients face significant barriers to PRS care, including geographic isolation, chronic underfunding of systems such as the Indian Health Service, a shortage of specialized providers in rural regions, socioeconomic hardship, and cultural mistrust rooted in historical trauma. Solutions discussed include expanding telehealth, establishing residency-based domestic outreach programs, supporting short-term training for local providers, and strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and tribal health systems. Increasing Indigenous representation in PRS and promoting tribal self-determination in healthcare are also emphasized as critical components of sustainable change. Conclusions: Efforts to address PRS disparities in Indigenous populations must be multifaceted, combining immediate access improvements with long-term investments in workforce development, infrastructure, and culturally attuned care. A coordinated approach among academic programs, policy stakeholders, and Indigenous communities is essential to achieving surgical equity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.