ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Understanding Functional and Hemodynamic Outcomes Across Lower Extremity Amputation Levels.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower extremity amputations (LEAs) significantly alter an individual's long-term functional capabilities and cardiovascular health. These outcomes vary significantly across LEA levels, affecting mobility, independence, and overall quality of life. Methods: This article reviews current literature to analyze these outcomes across different LEA levels including hemipelvectomy, hip disarticulation, above-knee amputation, knee disarticulation, below-knee amputation, Syme amputation, Chopart amputation, Lisfranc amputation, and toe disarticulation to elucidate outcomes, understand variations, and suggest directions for future research and informed clinical management. Results: Although mechanical and hemodynamic systems undergo significant adaptations following all levels of LEA, improved functional and cardiovascular outcomes are a direct result of retained body mechanics, preservation of joint function, and the degree of energy expenditure. Surgical severing of blood vessels and increased effort to effectively supply oxygenated blood throughout the body substantially raise the risk of developing diseases such as myocardial infarction, hypertension, aortic aneurysm, and peripheral arterial disease. Patient comorbidities not only necessitate amputation but also remain factors impacting wound complications, morbidity, mortality, and reamputation rates. Morbidity and mortality rates are notably high for higher level amputations due to the complexity of the surgery and the associated risk of complications. Complications such as infection, phantom limb pain, and deep vein thrombosis vary greatly by level of amputation and often present alongside markers of hemodynamic instability and shock. Conclusions: Recognizing the effects of each LEA level on patient quality and function of life is crucial for optimizing rehabilitation strategies and providing comprehensive patient support.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.