ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025
Exploring the impact of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in subjects with and without burnout: Potential benefits for executive function and neural processing.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sorting the mind: cognitive enhancement through transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many brain disorders and conditions, including occupational burnout, are linked with challenges in executive function (EF). Yet, there is a lack of treatments geared at restoring them. We have previously demonstrated that VNS enhances EF in patients with epilepsy and that transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) modulates the underlying neural processes in healthy subjects. In this study, we investigated the immediate impact of tVNS on EF in subjects with and without occupational burnout. Material and methods: We hypothesized that tVNS enhances EF, as reflected in both behavioral and neural levels. Subjects with (n = 27) and without burnout (n = 24) performed an integrated computer-based test of EF, the Executive Reaction Time (RT) test. At the same time, EEG was recorded and tVNS or sham stimulation was delivered to each subject in an alternating manner. Event-related potentials, N2 and P3, peak and interpeak amplitudes, and latencies were used to evaluate the speed and allocation of neural processes linked with EFs and errors and RTs to assess performance. Results: Frontal N2-P3 interpeak latency (IPL) in the NoGo condition was shorter with active tVNS (m = 157.6 ms (IQR = 59.2 ms)) than with sham (m = 169.6 ms (IQR = 88.4 ms), p = 0.01). Further, active tVNS reduced total errors in healthy subjects. Conclusion: Active tVNS resulted in partly accelerated neural processing in the context of response inhibition in both groups and enhanced EF performance in subjects without burnout. We suggest that tVNS enhances neural processes underlying EFs in specific situations. Even though caution is warranted, tVNS shows some promise as a potential cognitive enhancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.