ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025
The effects of protocol factors and participant characteristics on functional near-infrared spectroscopy data quality after stroke.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond behavior: a neurocognitive agenda for investigating the neural underpinnings of successful high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an emerging neurotechnology that has several advantages over fMRI, but questions remain about factors that affect data quality and activity in stroke survivors. We examined the effect of protocol factors (Aim 1) and participant characteristics (Aim 2) on raw fNIRS signal quality and tested associations between quality control metrics and brain activity and connectivity (Aim 3) in a sample of 107 individuals with a history of left or right hemisphere stroke. Participants completed tasks that varied by cognitive and motor speech demands (from low to high): Resting State, Discourse Comprehension, and Picture Naming. Scalp-coupling indices, peak spectral power values, and number of bad channels from each task were extracted from the Quality Testing of Near Infrared Scans (QT-NIRS) toolbox (Montero-Hernandez and Pollonini, 2020) and used to index raw data quality. Data quality did not vary by session location or protocol experience, but all data quality metrics from Picture Naming were significantly lower than those from the other tasks. fNIRS signals were generally worse for Black women compared to Black men and White individuals regardless of gender. No significant associations between the raw fNIRS signal quality and Resting State functional connectivity were found. However, relative changes in Picture Naming hemoglobin concentrations were associated with scalp-coupling indices for certain channels. These results highlight the need for careful data preprocessing of already collected data and a systematic approach in future studies to mitigate inherent biases of optical instruments, thereby enhancing the inclusion of underrepresented groups in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.