ArticleComputing in cardiology2024
Uncertainty Quantification of Fibrotic Conductivity Effects on Computational Model-Derived Ablation of Atypical Left Atrial Flutter.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac computational models are powerful tools to improve treatment of complex cardiac arrhythmias. However, such computational models rely on many uncertain inputs, and the effects of this input uncertainty on the model-derived treatment strategies are unclear. We have developed a computational model-guided ablation planning tool to aid in the ablation of reentrant circuits found in atypical left atrial flutter (ALAF). We then applied parametric uncertainty quantification to assess the effect of errors and variability in the conductivity of fibrotic tissue on the model outputs and suggested ablation patterns. In a computational model of a patient who presented with ALAF, we found that our model-guided ablation tool reduced the number of simulated ALAF circuits from 10 preablation to 4 postablation. Uncertainty quantification revealed that fibrotic conductivity affected the suggested ablation sites substantially; however, the uncertainty quantification also provided a method to display a proposed ablation strategy in a manner that accounts for the input parameter uncertainty. The results of this study show the twofold insight of UQ. This method provides a robust means to explore the effects of input parameter variability on predictions of reentrant arrhythmia. We suggest it can also present modeling results that display the uncertainty associated with model predictions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.