Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050888›Full record

ArticleComputing in cardiology2024

Application of Order and Sample Selection in Uncertainty Quantification of Cardiac Models.

Anna Busatto, Lindsay C R Tanner, Karli Gillette, Akil Narayan, Gernot Plank, Rob S MacLeod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computing in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna BusattoScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Lindsay C R TannerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Karli GilletteInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Akil NarayanScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Gernot PlankInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Rob S MacLeodScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
Integration of Uncertainty Quantification with SCIRun Bioelectric Field Simulation PipelineU24EB029012 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029012NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulating the electrical behavior of the heart requires accounting for parameter errors, model inaccuracies, and individual variations in settings, which can all be influenced by user choices or disease conditions. To map the effects of parameter uncertainty, we built on previous findings employing bi-ventricular activation simulations and robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) that maps variability in propagation simulations. The PCE approach offers efficient stochastic exploration with reduced computational demands. To ensure reliable results, we focused here on the importance of testing for polynomial order and sample size, aiming to obtain accurate outcomes with minimal computational burden. Order testing involves determining the polynomial degree used for calculating statistics, whereas sample testing pertains to identifying the necessary number and values of the parameters from which the UQ model is estimated. The guide for both steps was to ensure consistency in the results, roughly emulating a convergence analysis. We applied this approach to a bi-ventricular activation simulation using UncertainSCI and quantified the effects of physiological variability in conduction velocity. Our results show that the selection of the appropriate polynomial degree order and sample dataset influences the outcomes of simulations and should be a required step before performing a UQ analysis.

Identifiers

PMID41050888
PMCPMC12492624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.