ArticleComputing in cardiology2024
Application of Order and Sample Selection in Uncertainty Quantification of Cardiac Models.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simulating the electrical behavior of the heart requires accounting for parameter errors, model inaccuracies, and individual variations in settings, which can all be influenced by user choices or disease conditions. To map the effects of parameter uncertainty, we built on previous findings employing bi-ventricular activation simulations and robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) that maps variability in propagation simulations. The PCE approach offers efficient stochastic exploration with reduced computational demands. To ensure reliable results, we focused here on the importance of testing for polynomial order and sample size, aiming to obtain accurate outcomes with minimal computational burden. Order testing involves determining the polynomial degree used for calculating statistics, whereas sample testing pertains to identifying the necessary number and values of the parameters from which the UQ model is estimated. The guide for both steps was to ensure consistency in the results, roughly emulating a convergence analysis. We applied this approach to a bi-ventricular activation simulation using UncertainSCI and quantified the effects of physiological variability in conduction velocity. Our results show that the selection of the appropriate polynomial degree order and sample dataset influences the outcomes of simulations and should be a required step before performing a UQ analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.