Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050883›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2025

Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Decision-Making: An Updated and Comprehensive Overview of Precision and Personalization in Current Evidence.

Anfal Mohammed Alenezi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anfal Mohammed AleneziDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) surgery has been advanced through artificial intelligence (AI), which helps surgeons to gain more accurate results and apply surgical procedures. Despite the increasing focus on AI in BC management, there are knowledge gaps in the current understanding that can be readily identified from the existing works of literature. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the influencing role of AI technologies in precise and personalized clinical decision-making in BC surgery. We included articles published in English during the past 5 years from the major databases. Furthermore, this review used appropriate keywords with and without Boolean operators like "AND", "OR" and "NOT". We considered three major aspects for surgical practice: preoperative planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative outcomes, while interpreting the studies. We found that AI-assisted BC surgery has advanced through the development of a new real-time, accurate tumor identifier, margin assessment, and robotic-assisted surgeries. Moreover, AI-based algorithms are gradually incorporated into the evaluation of the postoperative probability of reoccurrence, complications, and patient satisfaction. It is documented that integrating AI technologies into BC care is inevitable and set to expand further in all aspects. Furthermore, this review identified some major challenges in the algorithm and ethical aspects. The limitations, such as lack of external validation, integration barriers, and the "black box" nature of some AI models, remain unresolved. To fully utilize AI's capabilities, it is recommended that surgeons, AI developers, and policymakers collaborate on more advanced AI that is enhanced for personalized care by including patients' genetics, medical history, and lifestyle factors. Additionally, future prospective and exploratory cost-effective analysis studies are to be done.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningintraoperativemachine learningpersonalized care

Identifiers

PMID41050883
PMCPMC12495932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.