Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050864›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Artificial neural network and machine learning predictive model for assessing physicochemical properties of garlic slices (

Hany S El-Mesery, Abdulaziz Nuhu Jibril, Ahmed H ElMesiry, Zicheng Hu, Xinai Zhang, Amer Ali Mahdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hany S El-MeserySchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Abdulaziz Nuhu JibrilCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Ahmed H ElMesiryFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, New Mansoura University, 35742, Egypt.
Zicheng HuSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Xinai ZhangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Amer Ali MahdiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the physicochemical characteristics of garlic slices dried using a microwave-assisted convective dryer controlled by an artificial neural network. The chosen drying conditions included: microwave power (100, 200, and 300 W), air temperatures (45, 55, and 65 °C), and airflow velocity (0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 m/s). Results showed that at 65 °C, 300 W, and 0.3 m/s, the minimum flavor was 4.95 mg/g dry mass, marking a 39.50 % reduction in allicin content. The highest vitamin C content of 0.1751 mg/g with a water activity level of 0.505 was recorded at drying conditions of 1.0 m/s, 45 °C, and 100 W. However, it was observed that increasing power to 300 W at 45 °C and 0.5 m/s improved the rehydration ratio by 15.53 %. This study utilized precise ANN modelling to achieve an excellent fit by clarifying the interactions among drying parameters, time, and physicochemical parameters. PCA highlighted notable similarities between total color changes and rehydration ratios of garlic samples. Integrating an ANN into microwave-convective drying provides advanced tools to optimize food drying processes, thereby enhancing productivity without compromising product quality.

Indexed as

Allicin contentArtificial neural networkFlavor strengthMicrowave dryingPrincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID41050864
PMCPMC12490423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.