ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Participation, knowledge, and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among migrant Burmese women on China-Myanmar border: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate cervical cancer screening participation, knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, attitudes toward relevant healthcare services, and associated factors among migrant Burmese women in Mangshi, a county on the China-Myanmar border in Southwest China's Yunnan province. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mangshi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021. Migrant Burmese women attending routine gynecological examinations were recruited via convenient sampling. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was utilized to collect data. Logistic regressions were utilized to assess factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation and knowledge level. Results: Among 1504 participants, 31.3 % ever attended cervical cancer screening. In the recommended age group of 25-64 years, the participation rate was 35.2 %. Screening participation was associated with age, marital status, occupation, and history of genital tract infection. Approximately 20.9 % had heard of human papillomavirus, 23.2 % knew cervical cancer is preventable, and 41.6 % had heard of cervical cancer screening. Awareness of risk factors, screening techniques, and symptoms was limited. The median knowledge score was 2.0 out of 19.0. Knowledge level was associated with education, age at menarche, number of sexual partners, and history of genital tract infection. Most (99.7 %) participants were willing to attend cervical cancer screening, but only 84.5 % would accept therapy if necessary. The most common barrier to therapy was unaffordable cost. Conclusions: Migrant Burmese women in Mangshi had suboptimal screening participation and inadequate cervical cancer knowledge. Screening policies should prioritize socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Enhancing targeted health education is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.