ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Factors associated with healthcare personnel uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccine doses in the United States.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19 vaccine booster uptake among healthcare workers in Bangladesh: predictors, challenges, and lessons from a low-income setting.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Willingness Towards and Associated Factors in Receiving COVID-19 Vaccination During and After the Pandemic.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate factors associated with United States (US) healthcare personnel (HCP) uptake of an updated COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: We analyzed data from 887 US HCP enrolled between September 25, 2023, and April 17, 2024, in a multisite case-control COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study. Sociodemographic and attitudinal data were collected via standardized surveys, and vaccination status was verified using source documentation. Results: Overall, 188 (21.2 %) HCP received the updated vaccine. HCP aged 50-64 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.02, 95 % CI: 1.11-3.67) versus ages 18-29, and HCP with undergraduate (aOR 3.75, 95 % CI: 1.97-7.12) or graduate degrees (aOR 7.73, 95 % CI: 4.10-14.55) versus high school/some college had higher odds of vaccination. Nurses and nurse assistants had lower odds (aOR 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.30-0.76) versus other job roles. Vaccinated HCP were more likely than unvaccinated HCP to cite concerns about personal infection (89.9 % vs. 44.6 %), infecting family/friends (96.3 % vs. 56.0 %), vaccine availability (63.3 % vs. 18.9 %), and peer-reviewed literature (56.4 % vs. 28.3 %) as important influences. These factors remained consistent with findings from a prior vaccine season. Conclusions: Vaccine access, education, and peer-reviewed information remain drivers of HCP vaccine uptake. Strategies should address occupational disparities and emphasize transmission risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.