ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Did the Medicaid expansion improve immunization among U.S. pregnant women?
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Power of public health advice: Effectiveness and spillover effects of federal vaccine recommendations.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion increased financial eligibility of low-income individuals. Its effects are mixed on influenza vaccination and unknown for Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccination among pregnant women in the United States. We aim to address mixed and missing evidence in literature. Methods: We merged 44,320 pregnant women from 2011 to 15 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System with National Welfare Data by residency. Treatment group included Medicaid enrollees in post-ACA expansion states. Control included non-Medicaid enrollees in expansion states and all individuals in non-expansion states. We employed triple-difference method to estimate Medicaid expansion treatment effects on individual vaccination probabilities, and associations with socioeconomics and demographics. Results: Treatment group did not differ from control to vaccinate due to Medicaid expansion. Additionally, post-ACA Medicaid enrollees were 4.5-9 % less likely to vaccinate than pre-ACA non-Medicaid enrollees. Medicaid enrollees in expansion states were 2.5 % less likely to vaccinate against influenza than non-Medicaid enrollees in non-expansion states. African Americans were 4-5 % less likely, while Native Americans were 3-7 % more likely, to vaccinate than counterparts. Those with low parity and college education were 3.2-5.4 % and 4.8-10.6 % more likely to vaccinate. Individuals in high-poverty states were 0.6 % less likely to receive the influenza vaccine. Conclusions: We contributed different national data on understudied populations and the triple-difference method to the literature. Income-based Medicaid expansion did not increase the likelihood of vaccination among pregnant women. Non-income-based policies may target Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women in expansion states for influenza vaccination. Future interventions may target high-parity, low-education, and African American pregnant women in high-poverty non-expansion states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.