Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050831›Full record

ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2025

Proactive Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project.

Maj Sarah McDonald, Derek Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maj Sarah McDonald18th Medical Group, Kadena Air Base, Japan.
Derek Smith673rd Medical Group, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: About 9% of all patients have a health record indicating penicillin allergy, but only 10% of these patients are truly allergic on confirmatory testing. This high percentage of incorrect labeling creates a burden for the health care system and patients, making the removal of this diagnosis an important priority. Until recently, penicillin delabeling has been done primarily by allergists, but integration with primary care is needed. Observations: A program was developed that successfully trained primary care practitioners (PCPs) to use the PEN-FAST clinical criteria to identify low-risk patients and conduct an oral test for allergy. This model allows low-risk patients to undergo testing in a primary care office with resources available to treat any immunoglobulin E mediated severe reaction. Patients who test negative for a penicillin allergy can then be delabeled and receive more appropriate antibiotics during future infections. Skin testing was only used in 18% of the tested population and 94% of tested patients tolerated the antibiotic and their penicillin allergy history was delabeled. Conclusions: In this program most penicillin allergy labels were cleared based on clinical criteria and oral challenge alone, highlighting the potential benefits of PEN-FAST. Expansion of training should be offered to PCPs to conduct oral challenges in appropriate settings in an effort to reduce this significant burden on patient care.

Identifiers

PMID41050831
PMCPMC12494337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.