ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The influence of contextual constraint and word length on eye movement control during Chinese reading.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given that Chinese text lacks explicit spaces to mark word boundaries, readers need to segment the continuous text into words of varying lengths. Contextual information helps determine word boundaries in Chinese reading. However, it remains unclear how contextual constraint and word length information guide eye movements during Chinese reading. To address this issue, the present study examined the relationship between contextual constraint and word length information in determining when and where to move the eyes in Chinese reading. We manipulated contextual constraint such that the target words were either predictable or unpredictable, and manipulated word length such that the target words were either single-character or three-character. The results demonstrated that both contextual constraint and word length influenced word skipping, fixation durations, saccade lengths, and landing positions. However, we did not find significant interactions between them across all measures. Moreover, Bayes factor analysis provided strong evidence for the absence of an interaction, suggesting that contextual constraint does not modulate the effect of word length on eye-movement control in Chinese reading. These findings advance our understanding of eye-movement control mechanisms in Chinese reading and provide empirical evidence for improving existing models of Chinese reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.