Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050809›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

The uncanny valley effect in embodied conversational agents: a critical systematic review of attractiveness, anthropomorphism, and uncanniness.

Ștefania Cihodaru-Ștefanache, Ioana R Podina

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ștefania Cihodaru-Ștefanache *Laboratory of Cognitive Clinical Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Ioana R Podina *Laboratory of Cognitive Clinical Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Uncanny Valley Effect (UVE) describes the discomfort users feel when interacting with Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs) that display human-like features, often resulting in anxiety, disgust, and avoidance. This systematic review investigates how user characteristics and ECA design features influence UVE, aiming to provide insights for improving user engagement. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 21,897 papers from ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Science, with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. These studies focused on the roles of anthropomorphism, attractiveness, and uncanniness in user interactions with ECAs. Results: Using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool, most studies were rated as having weak to moderate methodological quality. We developed a Checklist for Avoiding the Uncanny Valley Effect in ECAs, offering critical recommendations across key dimensions such as physical appearance, non-verbal and verbal communication, and the incorporation of social and cultural norms. Additionally, our review underscores the need for methodological improvements. Discussion: Future studies must address confounding variables with greater precision, provide transparent reporting on participant withdrawal, and employ more robust, standardized measurement tools to generate reliable and actionable findings. Without these advancements, the field risks perpetuating inconclusive and contradictory insights, limiting the development of ECAs that effectively engage users while mitigating the UVE. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023426584, identifier: CRD42023426584.

Indexed as

anthropomorphismcognitionembodied conversational agenthuman-computer interactionsystematic reviewUncanny Valley Effect

Identifiers

PMID41050809
PMCPMC12493983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.