SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
A systematic review on the eating behaviors of youth exceeding electronic device recommendations.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the rates of both disordered eating and electronic device usage in youth and adolescents have increased over the last two decades, several studies have looked to determine if there is any relationship between the two variables. While excessive screen use has broadly been shown to correlated with abnormal eating behaviors, newer research reveals that different types of screen use (e.g., social media, television, or video games) affect eating behaviors in youth and adolescents. The goal of this systematic review is to analyze to what extent different types of screen use are associated with disordered eating habits, as well as assess for nuance in both the age of the population studied, as well as the geographic location of the study. Methods: A search of relevant terms was conducted from PubMed ( Results: Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis, majorly consisting of cross-sectional studies. Results indicated that while there is overwhelming evidence that excessive screen use is correlated with disordered eating habits at large, individual trends in disordered eating vary depending on the type of screen exposure. Furthermore, some studies suggest that disordered eating is a secondary sequela associated with screen time, with the primary cause being lack of sleep or poor mental health. Discussion: This review is limited by small number of included studies, high number of cross-sectional studies, and small number of studies looking at populations under age twelve. These findings provide opportunities for both clinicians to evaluate their pediatric patients more holistically when treating for disordered eating behaviors. Furthermore, both clinicians and public health officials alike should consider type of screen time when making recommendations for healthy amounts of screen time for children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.