Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050796›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Beyond discipline: the power of mentalization in reducing disruptive behavior in schools: a mixed-methods analysis of teacher-child interactions.

Gali Chelouche-Dwek, Carla Clark, Peter Fonagy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gali Chelouche-DwekAnna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Carla ClarkResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter FonagyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Educators frequently encounter substantial challenges managing disruptive classroom behavior. This research examines Mentalization-Based Interventions (MBIs) within classroom to address disruptive behavior and emotional dysregulation, employing an attachment-focused perspective on teacher-student relationships. The study aimed to: (A) assess the effectiveness of MBIs in mitigating disruptive behavior and emotional dysregulation in classroom settings, and (B) analyze mentalizing patterns in teacher-student interactions during episodes of disruption. Methods: The research observed 10 male pupils (X̄age = 8.4 years) across two alternative provision school classrooms in London, focusing on teacher-student interactions during disruptive incidents. In total, 142 incidents of disruptive incidents were documented. Teachers' responses to pupil behavior were categorized and scored using six MBIs. Incidents were classified as resolved or unresolved based on the outcomes of these responses. Thematic analysis of incident transcripts was conducted and integrated with quantitative results through an embedded mixed-methods design. Results: Quantitative findings indicated that MBIs predicted behavior resolution, with more interventions being associated with an increased likelihood of resolving disruptive incidents. Discussion: The integration of qualitative analysis further underscored the efficacy of a multi-layered approach to addressing disruptive behavior. These findings contribute to the development of trauma-informed educational strategies and offer valuable insights for enhancing teacher-student interactions in settings where trauma and behavioral challenges are prevalent. Impact statement: This study demonstrates how Mentalization-Based Interventions (MBIs) can help teachers effectively manage disruptive classroom behavior, particularly among students with trauma histories. Through an analysis of real-world teacher-student interactions, the findings show that mentalizing interventions significantly increase the likelihood of resolving disruptive incidents. The study highlights the importance of teacher mentalization as a key tool for behavior management, offering practical insights for educators, caregivers, and mental health professionals working to foster emotionally supportive and trauma-informed learning environments.

Indexed as

classroom behavior managementcoding-schemeemotional regulationmentalization-based interventionsteacher–student interactions

Identifiers

PMID41050796
PMCPMC12488698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.