Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050788›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Crying in the algorithm: modeling academic stress via multilayer topic construction and ERA effect.

Liwei Ding, Hongfeng Zhang, Jinqiao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liwei DingFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Hongfeng ZhangFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Jinqiao ZhouFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid intensifying educational competition and societal expectations, academic stress has emerged as a multidimensional force influencing student mental health. While prior research has explored individual and institutional factors, limited attention has been paid to how learners semantically construct and express academic stress in digital environments. Addressing this gap, this study introduces an innovative multilayered topic modeling framework that integrates BERTopic and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), enabling a semantic, data-driven analysis of 33,827 user-generated comments related to academic pressure on social media. Grounded in Multilevel Stress Theory, the analysis identifies six interrelated topics reflecting the interplay of individual, situational, and structural stressors. Drawing on these findings, the study develops the Expectancy-Regulation-Amplification (ERA) Model, which conceptualizes academic stress as a dynamic process shaped by the tension between external expectations and perceived capabilities, limitations in self-regulatory resources, and the cumulative amplification of stress across sociocultural and digital environments. By mapping how academic pressure is linguistically reproduced and sentimentally intensified in algorithmic settings, the ERA model provides an interpretive framework for understanding the semantics of student vulnerability and contributes new insights to targeted interventions in educational and mental health contexts.

Indexed as

academic pressureexpectancy-regulation-amplification (ERA) modelmultilevel stress theorymulti level topic modelingsentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID41050788
PMCPMC12491209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.